Public and participant involvement (PPI) is central to conducting ethical and relevant research. In adolescent mental health research, involving young people is particularly important because their lived experiences and perspectives inform study relevance and impact. The SCAMP cohort investigates adolescent mobile phone use, cognition and mental health, and the SCAMP Research Challenge (RC) was developed to embed meaningful, reciprocal youth participation into that large-scale study.
The RC aimed to expand cohort recruitment using peer-led approaches and to engage students as active partners in co-delivering school-based data collections. A further objective was to provide training so participating students could develop their own research proposals using SCAMP data. Selected student projects would then be advanced collaboratively with SCAMP researchers.
The year-long RC programme was delivered twice over two academic years (2022–2024) in 19 secondary schools in Greater London. Each school nominated a student RC team. Those teams worked alongside SCAMP researchers to lead peer recruitment campaigns, co-organise school-based data collection sessions, and design student-led research proposals.
Selected student teams progressed to additional structured workshops that covered literature review, data interpretation and research communication. Engagement and recruitment outcomes from the RC were compared with previous SCAMP recruitment and data-collection waves that were researcher led.
Across the two iterations, RC teams recruited 1,982 new participants into the SCAMP cohort. Recruitment achieved higher participation rates within shorter timeframes than prior researcher-led approaches, demonstrating the effectiveness of peer-led recruitment.
Students took active roles in leading recruitment drives, facilitating data collection sessions in schools, and co-developing seven research projects. Topics chosen by student teams included digital technology and social media use, digital wellbeing and mental health. All seven projects are being prepared for submission to peer-reviewed journals.
Participants reported improvements in confidence, communication and analytical skills. Several students remained engaged beyond the programme as SCAMP Research Ambassadors or members of the Young People’s Advisory Group (YPAG), indicating sustained involvement and potential longer-term benefit to the cohort infrastructure.
The SCAMP Research Challenge illustrates that integrating PPI and participatory methods into large-scale youth research is both feasible and valuable. Peer-led recruitment substantially enhanced engagement and increased the volume of data collected within shorter periods. Co-development of research projects fostered skill development, empowerment and continued involvement from participating young people.
Embedding participatory models in school settings offers a potentially scalable approach to improving research relevance and impact, particularly for studies focused on adolescent mental health and digital behaviours. The RC model leveraged existing school structures and peer networks to extend reach beyond what researcher-only approaches achieved in comparable timeframes.
The programme faced challenges that warrant attention in future iterations. First, reliance on teacher nominations to select student teams may introduce opportunity bias and affect inclusivity. Second, logistical inconsistencies between schools influenced recruitment processes and the uniformity of student experiences across sites.
To address these issues, the authors recommend implementing transparent and standardised recruitment procedures to ensure equitable access and representation. Future RC iterations should plan for consistent logistics across participating schools and consider selection processes that reduce potential biases associated with teacher-led nominations.
The SCAMP Research Challenge demonstrates that co-developing research for and with young people can strengthen scientific outcomes while empowering adolescents as co-contributors. Peer-led approaches increased recruitment efficiency and engagement, while participatory training produced student-led research outputs and skills development. Embedding this participatory approach in educational settings is a scalable strategy for improving the relevance and impact of public health and mental health research involving young people.
Ethical approval for this work was provided by the North-West Haydock Research Ethics Committee (ref 14/NW/0347). The authors declare no competing interests. De-identified SCAMP data and code are available on request from scamp{at}imperial.ac.uk. Funders listed in the source include the Medical Research Council (MR/V004190/1), NIHR Health Protection Research Units in Chemical and Radiation Threats and Hazards (NIHR 200922, NIHR 207424), MRC Centre for Environment and Health (MR/S019669/1) and Rosetrees Trust (PGL23/100104).