This cross-sectional study estimated the 12-month prevalence of suicidal ideation among school-going adolescents in Nilphamari District, northern Bangladesh. Among 365 participants aged 13–19 years surveyed between May and June 2026, 112 reported suicidal thoughts in the prior 12 months, corresponding to a prevalence of 30.7% (95% CI 26.0%–35.7%). The authors highlight that suicidal ideation affected nearly one in three students in this sample.
The investigation was a school-based, cross-sectional survey conducted across eight secondary schools and colleges in Nilphamari District. Participants were adolescents aged 13–19 years who completed self-administered questionnaires during the study period (May–June 2026). The sample size was 365 students. The report notes that institutional permission and written participant assent were used; parental consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board for this minimal-risk school-based study.
Suicidal ideation was assessed by self-report covering the preceding 12 months. Mental-health and psychosocial variables were measured using validated instruments: the PHQ-9 for depression, the GAD-7 for anxiety, and the MSPSS for perceived social support. Additional self-reported items captured loneliness frequency, school truancy, history of intentional self-harm, exposure to physical harm, and parental education level.
The primary prevalence estimate was 30.7% (112/365; 95% CI 26.0%–35.7%). The authors frame this as a high burden of suicidal ideation among school-going adolescents in the study area and use this estimate to argue for enhanced identification and prevention within schools and families.
Multivariable logistic regression identified several factors associated with higher odds of suicidal ideation:
Depression category (PHQ-9): Participants classified with moderate depression had increased odds of suicidal ideation (AOR = 6.05; 95% CI 1.03–35.38; p = 0.046) and those with moderately severe depression also showed higher odds (AOR = 6.86; 95% CI 1.05–44.62; p = 0.044) compared with minimal depression.
Loneliness: Reporting feeling lonely “often” had the strongest association (AOR = 10.59; 95% CI 2.53–44.35; p = 0.001).
Truancy: Missing school for 6–9 days was associated with greater odds (AOR 4.44; 95% CI 1.24–15.90; p = 0.022) and missing ≥10 days was also associated (AOR 3.77; 95% CI 1.34–10.59; p = 0.012).
Intentional self-harm: A history of deliberate self-harm was associated with higher odds of suicidal ideation (AOR = 2.51; 95% CI 1.17–5.41; p = 0.018).
Physical harm exposure: Self-reported exposure to physical harm was associated with increased odds (AOR = 2.63; 95% CI 1.24–5.57; p = 0.012).
Maternal education: Maternal secondary education was associated with lower odds of adolescent suicidal ideation (AOR = 0.34; 95% CI 0.12–0.99; p = 0.048).
All associations above are reported from the primary multivariable model as presented in the source.
The authors conducted a sensitivity analysis excluding Item 9 of the PHQ-9 to generate a PHQ-8 score and re-evaluate the association between depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation. In this sensitivity analysis the association between depression score and suicidal ideation was not statistically significant (AOR = 1.06; 95% CI 0.96–1.17; p = 0.228). The report thus notes that the observed association with PHQ-9 categories in the primary model was not robust to exclusion of the suicidality item.
Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of North South University (Ref: 2026/OR-NSU/IRB/0511). The IRB waived parental consent and the study used participant written assent. The authors declared no competing interests. The de-identified dataset underlying the analyses is publicly available on Zenodo at the link provided in the article.
The authors conclude that the prevalence of suicidal ideation is high in this school-based sample and identify several potentially modifiable correlates—loneliness, school truancy, prior self-harm, and exposure to physical harm—alongside markers of depression. They recommend early school-based identification and support for adolescents with mental-health and psychosocial difficulties, greater family engagement, and strengthened suicide-prevention services. The article notes these steps are warranted given the frequency of suicidal thoughts among participants.
Limitations and cautions: This report is a preprint that has not been peer reviewed; the authors explicitly state it should not be used to guide clinical practice without further validation. Additional limitations such as sampling representativeness, measurement biases, or causal inference constraints are not elaborated in detail in the abstract; readers should consult the full manuscript for methodological specifics.