This study evaluated whether preschool-aged children enrolled in Medicaid who had untreated tooth decay identified at a baseline examination received dental restorative care within one year. The principal outcome, a treatment gap, was defined as having fewer teeth with dental treatment claims in Medicaid than the number of decayed teeth recorded on the baseline oral exam.
The authors sought to quantify the frequency of treatment gaps and to identify patient- and tooth-level factors associated with unmet restorative care among young children attending pediatric primary care.
The analysis was a retrospective cohort study using data collected as part of a cluster-randomized trial conducted between 2017 and 2022. Eighteen community-based pediatric primary care practices in Northeastern Ohio participated. The analytic sample comprised 766 eligible children identified from the trial dataset.
Dental treatment receipt was ascertained from Medicaid claims data for the year following enrollment. Baseline oral examinations documented the number and location of decayed primary teeth. The treatment gap outcome compared the count of teeth with claims for dental treatment to the number of decayed teeth observed at baseline; fewer treated teeth than decayed teeth indicated a gap.
Multivariable logistic regression models assessed associations between having a treatment gap and a set of covariates reported in the source. Covariates included child age, sex, race/ethnicity, caregiver education, and the number and anatomic location of decayed teeth at baseline (anterior versus posterior). Results are presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-values.
Of 766 eligible children, 487 (63.6%) attended a dental visit within one year as documented in Medicaid claims. Among those who attended and had untreated decay at baseline, 155 children were identified. Of these 155 children with baseline untreated decay, 90 (58.1%) had a treatment gap at one year — i.e., the number of teeth with treatment claims was fewer than the number of decayed teeth recorded on the baseline exam.
These findings indicate that more than half of Medicaid-enrolled children who attended well-child visits and later saw a dentist still had residual unmet restorative needs after one year.
Visual odontograms constructed from the baseline examinations showed that decay was concentrated on upper anterior and posterior primary teeth. The source emphasizes the anatomical distribution of disease rather than presenting additional tooth-by-tooth counts beyond those summarized in the main results.
In adjusted analyses, the odds of having a treatment gap increased with the number of decayed teeth and varied by tooth location. Specifically, a greater number of decayed posterior teeth was associated with higher odds of a treatment gap (OR = 1.90; 95% CI: 1.60–2.30). A greater number of decayed anterior teeth was also associated with higher odds of a treatment gap (OR = 2.19; 95% CI: 1.51–3.39). Both associations were statistically significant (p < 0.001).
Sociodemographic variables included in the models — child age, sex, race/ethnicity, and caregiver education — were not significantly associated with the presence of a treatment gap in these analyses.
The authors suggest that the observed pattern of persistent untreated disease may reflect clinical decision-making by dentists. Two possible explanations discussed in the source are (1) reluctance to restore primary teeth that are close to physiological exfoliation and (2) the logistical challenges of completing multi-visit restorative treatment in young children, which may result in care deferral or incomplete treatment courses.
To address the identified treatment gap, the authors highlight the role of non-surgical caries management strategies that can be delivered in pediatric primary care. The source specifically names silver diamine fluoride as an option that primary care providers can apply to control cariogenic bacteria and limit progression of decay, particularly when definitive restorative treatment is delayed or not completed.
The article is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed; the source cautions that findings should not be used to guide clinical practice without further evaluation. Ethical approval for the research was provided by the IRB of University Hospitals in Cleveland, Ohio. The authors stated that deidentified individual participant data will not be made available. Funding for the work was provided by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), with grant numbers reported in the source.
In this cohort of Medicaid-enrolled preschool children seen in pediatric primary care practices, attendance at a dentist within one year occurred for about two-thirds of children, but among those with baseline untreated decay who attended the dentist, a majority (58.1%) had fewer treated teeth than decayed teeth at one year. The number and location of decayed teeth (both anterior and posterior) were strongly associated with having a treatment gap, whereas measured sociodemographic factors were not. The authors propose that clinician preference to avoid restorations in teeth nearing exfoliation and the need for multiple visits to complete care may contribute to persistent unmet needs, and they recommend consideration of non-surgical interventions such as silver diamine fluoride in pediatric primary care to reduce progression while definitive care is arranged.
Note: All numeric results, analytic details, and study descriptors are drawn from the source preprint; the article is not peer reviewed and should be interpreted accordingly.