This preprint investigates using foundation model–generated heatmaps to make AI second opinions in radiology more interpretable and collaborative. The authors contrast typical AI decision support—delivered as a discrete probability or prediction—with a visual, spatially grounded approach that exposes model attention while clinicians form diagnoses. The study focuses on two main questions: how radiologists perform when diagnosing chest X‑rays from images alone, and whether access to model-derived heatmaps can support clinicians during the diagnostic process rather than simply serve as post‑hoc validation of a final decision.
To operationalise the concept of interactive visual support, the team developed an application that enables users to engage directly with model-generated heatmaps as they read images. The app permits clinicians to view spatial explanations during image interpretation, thereby creating a pathway for real-time human–AI collaboration. The authors describe this as an approach that treats AI not merely as an independent advisor giving a single score, but as an interpretable partner whose spatial feedback can be consulted while the human forms their diagnostic impression.
The work used publicly available chest X‑ray datasets; the preprint cites VinDr‑CXR and ChestDR as sources for images and annotations. Code, datasets, and the interactive application are publicly posted on GitHub at https://github.com/eedack01/heatmap_assisted_diagnosis. The authors also note that radiologist results and the heatmaps generated for the study are available through the links provided in the paper, supporting reproducibility and re‑use.
The core evaluation comprised a user study in which radiologists used the interactive application while diagnosing chest X‑rays. The study was designed to measure how access to deep learning–generated heatmaps influenced diagnostic behaviour and accuracy. The preprint frames this as assessing the utility of spatially grounded, interpretable feedback during the decision‑making process rather than after the fact. The summary in the source emphasises that findings provide new insights into how such feedback could be integrated into radiologist workflows.
The authors report that all relevant ethical guidelines were followed and that necessary IRB or ethics committee approvals or exemptions were obtained; details are provided in the full manuscript. They confirm patient/participant consent procedures were completed and that identifiers were not disclosed outside the research group. The preprint also states that the authors followed applicable reporting guidelines and that any prospective study registration requirements were addressed as appropriate. No competing interests were declared.
According to the preprint summary, interacting with interpretable heatmaps changed radiologist diagnostic behaviour and yielded findings that inform how spatially explicit AI feedback might be incorporated into routine practice. The work suggests a shift in framing AI tools from opaque validators to collaborative partners by exposing model reasoning through heatmaps and making those explanations available during image interpretation.
Practical implications highlighted by the authors include:
Enhancing transparency: Visual heatmaps provide spatial cues about model attention, which may help clinicians understand why a model highlights a region and reconcile that information with their own read.
Facilitating collaboration: An interactive interface allows clinicians to consult AI explanations dynamically, potentially improving trust and making the AI a more effective second opinion.
Enabling reproducibility: Public release of code, heatmaps, and radiologist results supports further evaluation and replication by other groups.
The medRxiv summary does not include quantitative performance metrics, statistical analyses, specific user study sample sizes, participant demographics, or precise effects on diagnostic accuracy. For numerical results, subgroup analyses, detailed methodology, and implementation specifics, readers should consult the full preprint and the linked GitHub repository. The preprint was posted on August 23, 2026, under a CC‑BY 4.0 license and includes a DOI for reference.