Vertebral artery stenosis is a treatable cause of posterior circulation ischemia for which endovascular stenting is a common intervention. Conventional angiography, specifically 2D digital subtraction angiography (2D DSA), remains the predominant imaging method for stent sizing because it depicts the vessel lumen. However, as a two-dimensional lumenogram with a limited number of image planes, 2D DSA can underestimate true vessel size. This limitation is particularly evident at the vertebral artery origin, where vessel tortuosity and overlapping adjacent structures can obscure accurate lumen assessment.
By contrast, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can visualize vessel wall architecture and identify the external elastic lamina (EEL), which better approximates the true outer boundary of the arterial wall. Measuring the EEL with IVUS may therefore yield larger diameter estimates than lumen-only angiography and could influence device selection and procedural outcomes.
The authors performed a retrospective measurement comparison study to evaluate differences between IVUS-derived EEL diameters and 2D DSA lumen diameters in patients with vertebral artery stenosis. Eight patients were included. For each patient, both 2D DSA and IVUS images were obtained along a continuous arterial segment. Vessel diameter measurements were extracted from the two imaging modalities and compared across the sampled arterial segments.
The study design, sample size, and measurement procedures are described in the preprint; specific imaging protocols, operator details, and measurement reproducibility metrics were not reported in the abstract. The investigation focused on diameter comparisons rather than clinical outcomes.
Comparison of diameter measurements demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the two techniques (p < 0.05). On average, EEL measurements obtained with IVUS were larger than lumen diameters measured by 2D DSA, with a mean percent increase of 32.96% and a mean absolute increase of 1.19 mm. The authors report that this discrepancy was consistent across the sampled arterial segments in the included patients.
No additional numerical breakdowns, subgroup analyses, or variability statistics were reported in the abstract. Details such as confidence intervals, per-patient results, or the exact statistical test used were not provided in the source text.
The observed measurement contrast has practical implications for endovascular management of vertebral artery stenosis. If angiography-based lumen measurements underestimate vessel size, stent selection based on 2D DSA alone may favor smaller devices. Smaller stents increase the risk of incomplete device apposition to the arterial wall (malapposition), which in turn can raise the likelihood of restenosis and stent thrombosis.
Using IVUS to measure the external elastic lamina (EEL) permits stent sizing that targets the true vessel dimension, enabling more secure strut placement on the tunica intima and more complete arterial expansion. The authors suggest that IVUS-guided EEL sizing can lead to more reliable treatment by reducing malapposition and improving stent expansion, though direct outcome data were not presented in the abstract.
This retrospective study received approval from the Saint Francis Institutional Review Board (IRB approval #23-54) on November 2, 2023. Patient information was de-identified and individual consent was not required per the authors' declarations. The authors stated that datasets generated and analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
The manuscript is posted as a medRxiv preprint and has not undergone peer review. The authors explicitly note that the work has not been certified by peer review and therefore should not be used to guide clinical practice. The authors declared no competing interests.
In this small retrospective comparison of eight patients with vertebral artery stenosis, IVUS EEL measurements were significantly larger than lumen diameters measured by 2D DSA, with a mean increase of 32.96% (1.19 mm). The discrepancy highlights a potential limitation of 2D angiographic lumenography for device sizing at the vertebral artery origin and supports the use of IVUS when accurate vessel dimension assessment is required for stent selection.
Readers should note that the preprint abstract does not report detailed methodology, per-patient results, or clinical outcomes associated with IVUS-guided sizing. Because the report has not been peer reviewed, further validation in larger, prospective studies with outcome data would be needed before changing clinical practice.