Motivation: Linkage disequilibrium score (LDSC) regression is a popular method to estimate heritability for complex traits using summary statistics and linkage disequilibrium (LD) reference panels, offering a practical alternative to methods requiring individual-level data. Despite its widespread use, LDSC regression can produce biased heritability estimates. The properties of LDSC regression were investigated using summary statistics from several large-scale Alzheimer's disease (AD) studies and a variety of LD reference panels. These heritability estimates were compared with those obtained from individual-level data. Results: When LDSC regression was applied to summary statistics obtained from meta-analysis, it led to an underestimation of heritability. This can occur if meta-analysis is used to combine studies of different ancestries leading to the caveat of the lack of an appropriate LD reference panel. Additionally meta-analyses often include studies with different phenotype definitions, that not only impacts heritability estimates but also makes them uninterpretable. Summary statistics generated from imputed variants, even those with high imputation accuracy, can lead to underestimation of heritability.
Motivation: Linkage disequilibrium score (LDSC) regression is a popular method to estimate heritability for complex traits using summary statistics and linkage disequilibrium (LD) reference panels, offering a practical alternative to methods requiring individual-level data. Despite its widespread use, LDSC regression can produce biased heritability estimates. The properties of LDSC regression were investigated using summary statistics from several large-scale Alzheimer's disease (AD) studies and a variety of LD reference panels. These heritability estimates were compared with those obtained from individual-level data. Results: When LDSC regression was applied to summary statistics obtained from meta-analysis, it led to an underestimation of heritability. This can occur if meta-analysis is used to combine studies of different ancestries leading to the caveat of the lack of an appropriate LD reference panel. Additionally meta-analyses often include studies with different phenotype definitions, that not only impacts heritability estimates but also makes them uninterpretable. Summary statistics generated from imputed variants, even those with high imputation accuracy, can lead to underestimation of heritability. For example, the heritability estimates for AD were reduced from 0.265 (se 0.148) to 0.160 (se 0.041) when imputed variants (INFO>0.9) were included compared to analyzing only genotype array variants. A decrease in heritability estimates was also observed when individual-level imputed variant data were analyzed using GCTA-GREML. Our findings highlight the caveats of estimating heritability using meta-analysis summary statistics or imputed data instead of genotyped or sequence data.