Study Objectives To develop and initially validate the Circadian Disruption Index (CDI), a self-report measure of circadian disruption, and obtain preliminary evidence of its responsiveness to circadian health education. Methods In Study 1, 244 participants completed a 22-item CDI version and external measures. The sample was randomly divided for exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Internal consistency, external associations, and discrimination of poor sleep quality were examined. In Study 2, 72 postgraduate students completed the CDI before and 1 week after a 16-hour circadian health education program in an uncontrolled pre-post design. Results Analyses yielded a 15-item, three-factor structure comprising rhythm stability and light exposure, behavioral habits and diet, and sleep quality and subjective complaints. Total-score internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's = 0.871). Confirmatory factor analysis showed a comparative fit index of 0.902 and a root mean square error of approximation of 0.072, although the Tucker-Lewis index was 0.882. CDI scores correlated with sleep quality, chronotype, corrected midsleep on free days, depression, and anxiety, but not social jetlag.
Study Objectives To develop and initially validate the Circadian Disruption Index (CDI), a self-report measure of circadian disruption, and obtain preliminary evidence of its responsiveness to circadian health education. Methods In Study 1, 244 participants completed a 22-item CDI version and external measures. The sample was randomly divided for exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Internal consistency, external associations, and discrimination of poor sleep quality were examined. In Study 2, 72 postgraduate students completed the CDI before and 1 week after a 16-hour circadian health education program in an uncontrolled pre-post design. Results Analyses yielded a 15-item, three-factor structure comprising rhythm stability and light exposure, behavioral habits and diet, and sleep quality and subjective complaints. Total-score internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's = 0.871). Confirmatory factor analysis showed a comparative fit index of 0.902 and a root mean square error of approximation of 0.072, although the Tucker-Lewis index was 0.882. CDI scores correlated with sleep quality, chronotype, corrected midsleep on free days, depression, and anxiety, but not social jetlag. The area under the curve for poor sleep quality was 0.807 (95% confidence interval, 0.753-0.862), with an exploratory cutoff of [≤] 23. In Study 2, CDI scores decreased from 22.26 to 19.88 (p = 0.002; Cohen's dz = 0.36). Conclusions The CDI demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency, a meaningful multidimensional structure, and responsiveness to short-term changes following circadian health education, supporting its potential utility for assessing circadian disruption and monitoring circadian-related behavioral changes.