This study evaluated whether 2D ultrasound measurement of quadriceps femoris (QFM) thickness is reproducible, repeatable, and useful to detect risk of malnutrition among heart failure (HF) outpatients. The reference standard for nutritional classification was the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria. Thirty HF participants were enrolled, of whom 16 were classified as malnourished and 14 as well-nourished according to GLIM.
The primary aims were to assess intra- and inter-operator agreement for QFM thickness measurements and to evaluate diagnostic performance to distinguish nutritional status, with a focus on identifying a measurement approach suitable as an initial rule-out screening tool in HF clinics.
QFM thickness was measured at two anatomical locations on the thigh: the mid-point and the two-thirds point. Measurements were performed on both legs (left and right) and recorded under two conditions: with probe pressure and without probe pressure. Multiple operators performed measurements to enable assessment of both intra-operator (same operator, repeated measures) and inter-operator (different operators) variability.
The protocol therefore allowed comparison across leg side, measurement site, probe pressure condition, and operator to determine sources of measurement variability and to identify the most stable measurement approach.
Paired t-tests were used to evaluate differences in QFM thickness across paired conditions: left versus right leg, with versus without probe pressure, and between operators for repeated measurements. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) quantified intra- and inter-operator agreement, providing estimates of reproducibility and repeatability.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to assess the ability of QFM thickness measurements to differentiate malnourished from well-nourished participants. Reported diagnostic metrics included area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity for the best-performing measurement condition.
Across a total of 48 paired comparisons, the majority showed no statistically significant differences. Differences were observed for the mid-point measurement in four comparisons; the two-thirds point measurement showed no differences across comparisons examined.
Intra- and inter-operator reliability was very high. ICC values for these analyses ranged from 0.943 to 0.996, indicating excellent agreement for QFM thickness measurements by 2D ultrasound under the study conditions.
Diagnostic performance was strongest for the two-thirds point measurement taken without probe pressure. ROC analysis for this condition yielded an AUC of 0.74. At the identified threshold, sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 43%. The combination of high sensitivity and more modest specificity suggests the measurement performed well as a rule-out tool: it identified all malnourished patients in this sample (no false negatives) but produced a notable rate of false positives.
The study reports that 2D ultrasound measurement of QFM thickness at the two-thirds point without applying probe pressure is a reproducible and repeatable measurement in HF outpatients. The high ICCs support reliability across operators and repeated measures.
Diagnostic results indicate this measurement has utility to rule out malnutrition due to its high sensitivity in the sample studied. In practical terms, a screening approach using this ultrasound measurement could efficiently identify patients who likely do not need further nutritional assessment, reserving more detailed evaluation for those with positive ultrasound findings or other clinical indications.
The absence of differences at the two-thirds site across comparisons and the better ROC performance for the no-pressure condition provide specific procedural guidance for clinics aiming to implement a pragmatic screening protocol.
These are preliminary findings from a small sample of 30 HF outpatients. The authors explicitly note that confirmation in a larger sample is required. The modest specificity observed (43%) limits the measurement’s ability to rule in malnutrition on its own and indicates a potential for false positives that would necessitate further assessment.
Details about exact measurement thresholds used for ROC-derived sensitivity and specificity were not reported in the source. Likewise, while data are said to be available on reasonable request, the source does not provide full datasets within the report.
Ethical approval for the study was granted by the Research Ethics Committee of the Centre hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal. The authors confirm participant consent was obtained. No competing interests were declared. The authors state that all data produced in the study are available upon reasonable request.
Overall, the report presents 2D ultrasound of the quadriceps femoris at the two-thirds point without probe pressure as a reliable, repeatable measurement with potential value as an initial rule-out screening tool for malnutrition in heart failure outpatient settings, pending validation in larger cohorts.