This preprint evaluated whether people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders who experience active auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) can match the loudness of their hallucinated voices to an adjustable external audio track. The aim was to assess feasibility of an audio-matching approach as a complement to traditional self-report scales and to capture participant perspectives on its usability and communicative value.
Eight participants with schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses and active AVH took part in the study. The authors report that ethical approval was provided by the University of British Columbia Children's and Women's Research Ethics Board. The study is reported as a preprint and has not been certified by peer review; the authors note that findings should not be used to guide clinical practice.
Each participant provided two types of loudness quantification. First, they rated the loudness of their AVH using a conventional Likert scale. Second, they used an audio-matching tool on headphones: an external audio track whose volume the participant adjusted to match the perceived loudness of their voices. Structured interviews were conducted after the quantification tasks, and responses were subjected to thematic analysis to capture participant viewpoints about the tool’s precision, acceptability, and usefulness for communication.
Quantitatively, the study found no significant correlation between the audio-matching outputs and the Likert scale scores. In other words, the two measurement approaches did not statistically converge in this sample.
Qualitatively, participant feedback favored the audio-matching method: seven of eight participants reported that the audio tool provided greater precision in quantifying AVH loudness and better enabled them to convey their internal experience to others. The authors highlight this majority preference despite the absence of statistical correlation between the measures.
Structured interviews and thematic analysis captured participant perspectives on the audio-matching approach. Reported advantages included increased granularity when describing loudness and improved ability to communicate subjective experiences to clinicians or study staff. The manuscript emphasizes that participants perceived the audio-matching tool as more precise than the Likert scale, and that this perceived precision aided interpersonal communication about AVH. Details of specific themes and illustrative quotations are reported in the manuscript’s qualitative section.
The authors interpret the findings to suggest that digital audio-matching tools may offer meaningful advantages over traditional categorical or ordinal scales for quantifying the loudness dimension of AVH. They note that the participant-reported benefits—greater perceived precision and communicative value—could make such tools valuable for longitudinal tracking of AVH loudness even when short-term statistical convergence with existing measures is not demonstrated.
At the same time, the authors emphasize that loudness alone cannot fully capture the qualitative richness of voice-hearing experiences. The study frames the audio-matching approach as a potentially useful component of a broader assessment strategy rather than a standalone measure of AVH phenomenology.
The manuscript explicitly lists several limitations:
The authors caution that these limitations mean the tool’s validity and broader applicability remain to be established.
Based on participant preference and perceived benefits, the authors recommend further investigation of digital approaches to AVH assessment. They propose that audio-matching tools merit additional study in larger samples and in longitudinal designs to evaluate their sensitivity to change over time. The paper suggests such tools could complement existing scales for clinical monitoring or research, but does not claim that they should replace established measures.
The study declares no competing interests. Funding is reported from BC Mental Health & Substance Use Services. The authors state that all data produced in the work are contained in the manuscript. The preprint was posted July 28, 2026.
In this small feasibility study, an audio-matching tool for quantifying AVH loudness was usable by people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders; most participants found it more precise and helpful for communication than a Likert scale, although the two measures did not correlate statistically in this sample. Further, larger and longitudinal studies are recommended to evaluate validity and clinical utility.