Shift work disrupts circadian rhythms through altered sleep–wake cycles and atypical light exposure, contributing to higher risks of metabolic disorders, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and increased all-cause mortality. Healthcare staff are among the groups most exposed to rotating shift schedules, yet there are relatively few non-pharmacological interventions with supporting evidence tailored to this population. Commercial devices that combine environmental sound masking with behavioural audio content represent a potential low-burden approach to support sleep in shift workers.
The pilot study aimed to assess the acceptability and perceived effectiveness of commercial noise-masking earbuds in improving subjective sleep characteristics among National Health Service (NHS) healthcare staff working fast rotating shifts.
This was a pre–post pilot interventional study drawing participants from the EClocker Study. Twenty-seven NHS nurses aged 26–43 years (88.9% female) participated. The intervention device was the Kokoon NightBuds, which contain onboard sensors paired to a smartphone app. The app recorded sleep-related sensor data and delivered an audio library of personalised relaxation exercises and sleep techniques derived from cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I).
Study procedures included a two-week pre-intervention monitoring period during which daily smartphone-based Experience Sampling Methods (ESM) captured perceived sleep patterns via sleep diaries. Following baseline monitoring, participants used the noise-masking earbuds for six weeks. Outcome measures reported by the authors were subjective sleep changes measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global and subcomponent scores, daily Consensus Sleep Diary (CSD) entries collected via ESM, and participant-reported acceptability and perceived helpfulness of the earbuds.
Use of the noise-masking earbuds over six weeks was associated with small perceived improvements in several subjective sleep measures and overall promising acceptability.
PSQI and subcomponent findings reported by participants included:
Daily sleep diary (CSD) results collected via smartphone ESM showed small average improvements post-intervention:
The authors describe these as perceived and small improvements rather than definitive clinical changes; outcomes were derived from self-report and daily diary measures paired with device monitoring.
Overall acceptability metrics reported by participants were encouraging for this pilot cohort:
The earbuds were generally well tolerated across participants. The authors declared no competing interests.
According to the authors, this is the first European pilot trial of noise-masking earbuds targeting healthcare staff working fast rotating shifts. The six-week intervention produced preliminary evidence of good acceptability and small perceived improvements in several subjective sleep measures among a sample of NHS nurses. Findings suggest that noise-masking earbuds with integrated sensor monitoring and CBT-I–informed audio content may be a feasible, non-pharmacological adjunct to support sleep for shift-working healthcare staff.
These results are preliminary and descriptive: they reflect participant perceptions and small average changes reported in sleep diaries rather than definitive efficacy demonstrated in a controlled trial. The study supports further investigation, ideally with larger samples, controlled designs, and objective outcome measures to establish effectiveness and generalisability.
The study followed relevant ethical guidelines. Ethics approval for the EClocker Study was provided by the Research Ethics Committee at King’s College London (HR-19/20-17792). The study was approved by the Health Research Authority (HRA) and participating NHS Trusts via the Integrated Research Application System (IRAS 289592). All participants provided informed consent prior to participation. The authors reported registration and adherence to reporting guidelines where applicable.
Funding sources declared included the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, King’s College London, and the Wellcome Trust (grant 227099/Z/23/Z). The authors declared no competing interests.
The authors note that all data produced in the study are available upon reasonable request. The preprint is hosted on medRxiv with DOI https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.08.28.26361673. No additional unpublished outcome data or further methodological details beyond those presented in the source were provided in the preprint.