This preprint examined whether spouses' perceptions of women's empowerment relate to agreement (concordance) on fertility desires among currently married couples in Pakistan. The analysis focused on two empowerment domains: household decision-making and attitudes toward intimate partner violence (IPV). The stated aim was to explore how gendered dynamics within couples associate with whether both partners want more children or differ in their fertility desires.
The study used secondary data from the Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) 2017–18. The analytic sample comprised 3,027 currently married couples for whom both partners’ responses were available. Because the analysis used publicly available DHS data, the authors reported that separate institutional review board (IRB) approval was not required for the secondary analysis.
Empowerment was operationalized using items related to household decision-making and attitudes toward IPV as captured in the DHS instrument. The authors applied principal component analysis (PCA) to assess the internal consistency and dimensionality of items within each construct. Following PCA, items within each empowerment construct were summed to generate categorical scores representing perceived levels of empowerment for each spouse.
Fertility desires were assessed for both spouses and categorized to enable comparison of concordance. The specific categories of fertility desire used in regression models were implied by comparisons reported in the results (for example, both spouses wanting more children versus discordant responses such as wife wanting more while husband wants no more).
Principal component analysis was used to validate the dimensionality of the decision-making and IPV attitude items prior to creating summed empowerment scores. To quantify spousal agreement on fertility desires, the study used the Kappa coefficient, a measure of inter-rater agreement that accounts for chance concordance.
To estimate associations between perceived empowerment and patterns of concordance in fertility desires, the authors fitted multinomial logistic regression models and reported relative risk ratios (RRRs) for different concordance/discordance outcomes, using one concordant category (both spouses wanting more children) as a reference in reported comparisons.
The analysis found a moderate level of spousal agreement on fertility desires, with a reported Kappa = 0.51. This indicates that, overall, husbands and wives agreed more often than would be expected by chance but that disagreement remains common.
Among the association results highlighted in the report, a wife’s perception of having high household decision-making authority was associated with a statistically notable increase—more than two-fold—in the likelihood of a specific discordant pattern: the wife wanting more children while the husband wanted no more. This comparison was made against the reference group of couples in which both spouses wanted more children. The source reports that relative risk ratios were estimated across concordance/discordance categories, but it provides this specific significant association as a principal finding.
The authors interpret their findings as contributing to understanding how gendered dynamics within couples relate to fertility desires. The observed association—where a higher self-reported decision-making role for the wife corresponded with increased likelihood of wife-only desire for more children—suggests complex relationships between perceived household power and reproductive preferences.
The report highlights the potential programmatic implication that efforts to increase both spouses’ involvement in reproductive decision-making may be important. By underscoring the role of couple-level perceptions of empowerment, the authors suggest that interventions and policies that engage both partners might better address disparities in fertility preferences and subsequent reproductive behavior.
The study used publicly available DHS datasets; the authors stated that no additional IRB approval was required for the secondary analysis. Participant consent and appropriate data protections associated with the DHS were noted. The preprint declares no competing interests.
As reported on the medRxiv page, this article is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed; therefore its findings should not be used to guide clinical practice without further validation. The source text does not provide a detailed limitations section in the abstract and main metadata included here; any additional limitations, sensitivity analyses, or full model estimates (beyond the highlighted association and Kappa statistic) were not reported in the extracted source content.
Overall, the analysis using Pakistan DHS data described here links spouses’ perceptions of decision-making authority and attitudes toward IPV to patterns of concordance in fertility desires and highlights the importance of couple-level dynamics for reproductive decision-making policy and programs.