Climate change and extreme weather events (EWEs) pose threats to health systems and can disrupt continuity of care for communicable diseases such as HIV and tuberculosis (TB). The district level is where service delivery and climate adaptation are operationalised in South Africa, yet few empirical studies have quantified district-level vulnerability combining disease burden, health system capacity, socio-economic sensitivity, and hazard exposure. This study aimed to produce a district-level composite HIV/TB Vulnerability Index and a complementary Hazard Index to identify areas where underlying vulnerability coincides with elevated hazard risk.
The investigators developed two linked indices at district level: a composite HIV/TB Vulnerability Index and a Hazard Index. The vulnerability index integrated indicators across three domains: disease burden (sensitivity), health system capacity (adaptive capacity), and socio-economic vulnerability. Indicators were sourced from national surveys, routine health information systems, and international hazard datasets. All indicators were normalised using a min–max scaling approach and aggregated with equal weighting to produce composite scores. The Hazard Index was derived from international hazard datasets to capture exposure to EWEs, including metrics related to heat stress and flood/heavy-rainfall hazards.
The study included sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the composite indices to methodological choices. Specific details of the individual indicators, their original sources, and the exact weighting and aggregation formulae are reported in the article and supplementary materials; where precise indicator lists or numeric thresholds are not reproduced here, readers should consult the original preprint and supplementary files for full technical specification.
Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the stability of the composite indices under alternative assumptions. The authors report conducting these analyses to ensure the indices were robust to choices in scaling and aggregation. The article indicates these checks were part of the methodological pipeline but does not report additional quantitative results or alternate index versions in the abstract; full sensitivity analysis outputs are available in the main text and supplementary materials referenced by the authors.
Districts identified as most vulnerable on the HIV/TB Vulnerability Index were predominantly located in the Northern Cape, Eastern Cape, and KwaZulu-Natal provinces. In these areas, a high combined burden of HIV and TB, elevated socio-economic sensitivity, and constrained health system adaptive capacity converged to produce elevated vulnerability scores. Conversely, districts with the lowest vulnerability scores were concentrated in Gauteng and the Western Cape, reflecting relatively stronger health system capacity and more favourable socio-economic conditions.
Hazard exposure exhibited a clear geographic pattern across South African districts. Western districts tended to show greater exposure to heat stress, while eastern districts experienced higher exposure to flood and heavy-rainfall hazards. This spatial division of hazard types highlights different climate risk profiles across provinces and suggests hazard-specific preparedness needs.
When the Hazard Index was combined with the HIV/TB Vulnerability Index, the authors identified districts where high underlying vulnerability coincided with higher likelihood of EWEs, producing areas of compound susceptibility. These high compound-risk districts clustered predominantly along the east coast. Examples named in the preprint include Ugu, uMkhanyakude, and Harry Gwala in KwaZulu-Natal, and O.R. Tambo and Alfred Nzo in the Eastern Cape. The combined mapping therefore pinpointed geographic priorities where continuity of HIV/TB services and targeted adaptation measures may be most urgently required.
The authors interpret their findings to indicate that South Africa’s district-level vulnerability to climate and weather hazards is driven by the convergence of three factors: high HIV/TB burden, constrained health system capacity, and socio-economic disadvantage. Where these vulnerabilities overlap with increased hazard exposure, the resulting compound susceptibility warrants attention for policy and practice.
The study provides evidence to support geographically targeted adaptation strategies that prioritise continuity of HIV/TB services, strengthen health system resilience, and implement hazard-specific preparedness measures. The authors recommend focusing adaptation investments and planning in districts identified as having both high vulnerability and high hazard exposure, particularly in the eastern coastal clusters highlighted by their analysis.
The authors state that all data produced in the study are publicly available at cited sources or available upon reasonable request. The work was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR204828). The authors declared no competing interests and reported compliance with relevant ethical guidelines and approvals. This report is a preprint and has not undergone peer review; the authors note that findings should not be used to guide clinical practice without further validation.