This study analyzed national surveillance data on leptospirosis from the Dominican Republic covering 2012 through June 2026. A total of 8,425 records were extracted from the national system; 5,412 records met the study's case‑definition criteria and were categorized as 3,441 suspected, 1,448 probable, and 523 confirmed cases. Case classification and inclusion were governed by the surveillance definitions supplied by the data custodians. The dataset was provided in anonymized, aggregate form by the Dominican Republic Ministry of Public Health and Social Assistance (MISPAS) through the General Directorate of Epidemiology (DIGEPI).
Across the period 2012–2025, the cumulative incidence of leptospirosis in the Dominican Republic was 3.55 per 100,000 person‑years. Laboratory confirmation of cases was limited early in the study interval but improved substantially in recent years: historical confirmation was 9.7% overall, increasing to approximately half of reported cases in 2025 and exceeding half of cases in 2026. The authors note that limited diagnostic confirmation has been a central barrier to accurately characterizing disease burden, with confirmation rates surpassing 40% only from 2023 onward.
Although the overall incidence did not show a statistically significant trend when evaluated across all years (p = 0.15), the time series segregated into three distinct periods. The pre‑COVID period exhibited declining infection, the COVID years corresponded to a low‑infection phase, and the post‑COVID interval showed increasing infection. These phase distinctions were identified by temporal patterning in the surveillance records rather than by a single linear trend across the full interval.
Leptospirosis cases clustered in the rainy/hurricane season (May–November), accounting for 61.1% of cases; this seasonal concentration was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The study integrated geospatial meteorological data from the Dominican Institute of Meteorology (INDOMET) and reported a marginal positive correlation between rainfall and case counts (r = 0.553, p = 0.062), indicating a trend consistent with an association between increased precipitation and leptospirosis incidence, though the correlation did not meet conventional thresholds for statistical significance.
Risk was unevenly distributed across provinces. Rural provinces experienced disproportionate burden relative to large urban and coastal areas. The highest provincial incidence reported was in Hermanas Mirabal at 16.43 per 100,000 person‑years. By contrast, large urban and coastal provinces had rates approximately 80% lower than the highest rural provinces. The geographic heterogeneity highlights localized hotspots amenable to targeted public health interventions.
Incidence differed markedly by sex and age. Men had a 2.73‑fold higher incidence compared with women (95% CI 2.56–2.90). Age distribution of cases showed a peak in younger cohorts, notably the 10–29 year age range. These demographic patterns identify populations at elevated risk for exposure and disease and can inform prevention messaging and clinical suspicion thresholds.
Clinical comorbidity emerged as the strongest predictor of developing complications among reported cases. Presence of comorbidity was associated with an odds ratio of 2.84 for complications (95% CI 2.01–4.02; p < 0.001). The study underscores comorbidity as a key factor in clinical severity and an important consideration for triage and management.
Surveillance data underpinning this analysis were provided by MISPAS/DIGEPI and precipitation data were obtained from INDOMET. Because these datasets derive from national surveillance and meteorological systems and may contain sensitive information, they are not publicly available. The authors indicate that de‑identified data may be requested from the corresponding author or directly from DIGEPI/MISPAS and INDOMET, subject to institutional approval. The protocol received institutional review board oversight from Florida Atlantic University (protocol IRB2606182), and the data were shared in anonymized aggregate form.
This first multi‑decade national analysis for the Dominican Republic identifies clear seasonal windows (May–November), rural provincial hotspots, and demographic groups (men, ages 10–29) with elevated incidence. The findings emphasize expanding diagnostic capacity and laboratory confirmation as essential priorities to improve burden estimation and guide case management. Targeted surveillance efforts in high‑risk provinces and during the rainy/hurricane season, together with clinical attention to patients with comorbidities, are recommended focal points based on the observed patterns. The study also documents recent improvements in laboratory confirmation beginning in 2023, which may enhance future surveillance fidelity.
Note: Data availability statements, exact case‑definition criteria, and additional methodological details were provided in the source report; where specific operational definitions or line‑level data were not reported verbatim in the source, those finer details are not reproduced here.