Conduction System vs Biventricular Pacing in Heart Failure

01 Apr 20264 min read0 viewsJournal Feed

GIST

The PhysioSync-HF randomized clinical trial compares conduction system pacing vs biventricular pacing on heart failure–related outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle-branch block.

Clinical Editorial

Summary

JAMA Cardiology published a clinical update in Cardiology on 01 Apr 2026.

The item focuses on Conduction System vs Biventricular Pacing in Heart Failure.

Review the original article for the full source wording and details.

Source Reference

Read the full original publication from the source journal or publisher link below.

Open Original Source More Feed Items

Related by Condition/Drug

JAHARelated by Conditionheart failure

Long‐Term Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low‐Flow Low‐Gradient Aortic Stenosis: A Reconstructed Time‐to‐Event and Multivariate Meta‐Analysis

Cardiology • 27 Apr 2026

JAHARelated by Conditionheart failure

Mavacamten in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: National Insights on Access and Safety Profile From Real‐World Data

Cardiology • 27 Apr 2026

ClinicalTrialsRelated by Conditionheart failure

UPTAKE: Using Personalized Risk and Digital Tools to Guide Transitions Following Acute Kidney Events

Cardiology • 07 Apr 2026

ClinicalTrialsRelated by Conditionheart failure

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety Profile of Understudied Drugs Administered to Children Per Standard of Care (POPS)

Cardiology • 06 Apr 2026

Benefits of physical activity may outweigh risks for children with some heart conditions

Cardiology • 23 Apr 2026

Benefits of physical activity may outweigh risks for children with some heart conditions

Cardiology • 23 Apr 2026

Feed Metadata

Source

JAMA Cardiology