Journal of the American Heart Association, Volume 15, Issue 12 , June 16, 2026. BackgroundThe relevance of prior antithrombotic and thrombolytic treatment for decision‐making regarding endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion with established large infarcts is uncertain.
This study investigates associations of prior antithrombotic medication and thrombolysis with the efficacy and safety of EVT for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion with established large infarct.MethodsTENSION (Efficacy and Safety of Thrombectomy in Stroke With Extended Lesion and Extended Time Window) was a prospective randomized open‐label blinded–end point clinical trial. Patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion and established large infarct were randomized to EVT with medical therapy or medical therapy alone.
Exposures were preadmission antithrombotic treatment with antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants and intravenous thrombolysis. The primary efficacy end point was functional outcome at 90 days.
Safety outcomes included death and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.ResultsThe study included 246 patients (median age, 74 years; interquartile range, 65 to 80 years; 49% women); 124 (50%) were assigned to EVT.
Journal of the American Heart Association published a clinical update in Cardiology on 09 Jun 2026.
The item focuses on Large Core Stroke Thrombectomy Is Safe and Effective Regardless of Prior Antithrombotic or Thrombolytic Treatment: A Secondary Analysis of the Randomized TENSION Trial.
Review the original article for the full source wording and details.