Post‑traumatic epilepsy (PTE) is a recognized sequela of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and has been associated with greater cognitive difficulties than TBI alone. The authors sought to determine whether a distinct cognitive profile differentiates TBI patients who develop PTE from those who do not by tracking cognitive performance over time after TBI and comparing it with performance in people with established PTE and healthy controls.
This was an outpatient observational study combining prospective longitudinal assessment of recent TBI cases with a retrospective sample of individuals with pre‑existing PTE and a healthy control group. Cognitive testing was performed at prespecified time windows to evaluate change across domains after injury.
Three participant groups were included: a prospective TBI cohort assessed within 6 months post‑injury (TBI‑6M, n=32) with follow‑ups at 12 months (TBI‑12M, n=26) and 18 months (TBI‑18M, n=25); a retrospective group with established PTE (PTE, n=20); and healthy control subjects (HC, n=41). The report does not provide additional demographic breakdowns in the abstract.
A battery of neuropsychological tests produced 15 test components for analysis. Specific named tests referenced in the abstract include the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) in written and oral forms, the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), and the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test–Revised (HVLT‑R) Delayed Recall. These instruments were used to index information processing speed, working memory, executive function, visual attention, and auditory learning/verbal memory.
The authors used linear mixed effects modeling to evaluate cohort‑level differences in cognitive function and to assess changes over time within the prospective TBI group. The abstract reports group comparisons and p values for key tests and contrasts between timepoints and cohorts.
At baseline (within 6 months of injury), TBI‑6M subjects were not significantly different from the PTE group across the cognitive measures reported in the abstract. Compared with healthy controls, the PTE group showed significant performance deficits on 11 of 15 test components.
Overall, TBI participants demonstrated a general trend toward cognitive recovery with time: 9 of the 15 test components showed some degree of improvement by later follow‑up visits. Contrasts between early post‑injury and later timepoints yielded statistically significant improvements on several measures.
Information processing speed and working memory: These domains showed the strongest recovery trajectory. The SDMT written score improved markedly between TBI‑6M and TBI‑18M (reported p<0.0001). SDMT oral and COWAT (measuring aspects of processing speed and executive function/fluency) also improved significantly (reported p<0.001).
Visual attention and working memory: These domains exhibited smaller but statistically significant recovery when comparing TBI‑18M with the PTE group (reported p<0.05), indicating partial normalization over time.
Verbal learning and delayed recall: By contrast, auditory learning and verbal memory measured by HVLT‑R Delayed Recall showed persistent impairment in the TBI group at 18 months relative to healthy controls (reported p<0.0001). This suggests a chronic deficit in verbal memory that did not recover within the study window.
The authors conclude that domains reflecting information processing speed and working memory are sensitive indicators of recovery after TBI, showing substantial improvement over 18 months. In contrast, auditory learning and verbal memory appear to show chronic impairment after TBI. They propose that when recovery in domains that typically recover is blunted or stagnates, this pattern may correlate with an elevated risk of developing PTE. The work highlights potential domain‑specific markers that could inform prognosis and risk stratification, but the abstract does not provide thresholds or predictive models.
The authors report institutional review board approval from Rutgers University and confirm that participant consent and reporting guidelines were followed. All data generated in the study are available from the authors on reasonable request. Funding acknowledged includes a U.S. Department of Defense / Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program Epilepsy Research Program Idea Development Award (W81XWH‑18‑1‑0655).
This report is a preprint posted on medRxiv and has not been peer reviewed; the authors and medRxiv note it should not be used to guide clinical practice. The abstract provides limited demographic and methodological detail (e.g., injury severity distribution, exact test administration protocols, and covariate adjustments), which are not reported in the abstract and thus cannot be summarized here. The association between stagnated recovery and risk for PTE is presented as a proposed correlation rather than an established causal relationship in the abstract.
Findings suggest clinicians and researchers should attentionally monitor trajectories across cognitive domains after TBI: robust recovery in processing speed and working memory may be expected, whereas persistent deficits in verbal memory may be chronic. The authors suggest that lack of expected recovery in typically improving domains could flag patients at higher risk for PTE, warranting further study and validation in larger, peer‑reviewed cohorts.