This study assessed whether a temple-worn optical wearable, Temple, that reports a proprietary, dimensionless Brain Flow index, can serve as a proxy for relative changes in cerebral hemodynamics when compared with transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound. TCD measured blood-flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery (MCAv), serving as the established cerebrovascular reference. The primary objective was to evaluate temporal tracking and directional concordance of the Brain Flow index with MCAv during acute physiological perturbations.
The wearable under evaluation (Temple) outputs the Brain Flow index, intended to reflect relative cerebral blood-flow changes. The reference device, TCD ultrasound, provided continuous measurements of MCAv, a widely used index of cerebral blood-flow velocity. The comparison focused on within-session, relative changes rather than absolute-unit agreement because the Brain Flow index is a proprietary, dimensionless signal.
Twenty-three healthy adults were enrolled in the study. For analysis, twenty participants were included per protocol. Participants completed two physiological challenges designed to elicit distinct and acute cerebral hemodynamic responses: a cycle-ergometer exercise protocol and a stand-to-supine postural transition protocol. These perturbations were selected to produce increases and decreases in cerebral blood flow with differing temporal dynamics.
Because the Brain Flow index is dimensionless and units differ between devices, both signals were standardized within each session before comparison. This session-specific normalization emphasizes the shape and temporal course of relative changes rather than agreement in absolute units. The authors used within-subject temporal correlation analyses and transition-response metrics to compare signals.
The Brain Flow index tracked MCAv in both the exercise and postural transition protocols. Within-subject temporal correlations were strong: median Pearson r = 0.795 for the exercise protocol and 0.799 for the postural transition protocol (p < 0.001 for both). These correlations indicate that the wearable reproduced the timing and relative fluctuation pattern of MCAv across the tested perturbations.
The study examined directionally concordant transition responses for both increases and decreases in flow. Statistical testing showed the wearable and TCD produced concordant, significant transition responses. Bland–Altman analysis was applied to normalized transition responses and demonstrated small mean biases between devices, consistent with similar relative response shapes. Because the comparison was performed after within-session standardization, Bland–Altman findings pertain to normalized response agreement rather than absolute-value agreement.
Findings indicate the Brain Flow index reproduced the direction and time course of MCAv under both perturbations. Notably, the wearable matched MCAv dynamics during the postural transition even when heart rate moved in the opposite direction, suggesting a specific temporal relationship between the wearable signal and cerebral blood-flow velocity. However, because the wearable signal is dimensionless and comparisons were performed after standardization, results support concordance in relative response shape and timing rather than validation of absolute cerebral blood-flow quantification.
The authors note that further studies are needed using complementary modalities and additional cerebrovascular reactivity challenges to establish clinical use cases and to determine cerebral specificity of the Brain Flow index. The present findings support the wearable as a candidate for tracking relative cerebral hemodynamic changes in ambulatory or non-laboratory settings, but do not establish equivalence in absolute measurement units or clinical diagnostic thresholds.
Ethical approval was provided by the Institutional Human Ethics Committee of Lala Lajpat Rai Memorial Medical College, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut (approval SC-1/2025/9370 dated 16 December 2025). The authors declared no competing interests. Data from the study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. Funding was declared from Temple Pvt. Ltd., Gurugram, India.