This study titled RObotic WAlking for children who CAnnot WAlk (RoWaCaWa) investigated the effects of a 12-week robotic walking intervention on physical function and sequelae of inactivity in people with pediatric-onset neuromotor impairments. The authors sought to describe changes in family-centered goals, postural control, physical activity, and secondary outcomes such as sleep and bowel function when the intervention was delivered in home and community settings and followed for 12 weeks post-training.
RoWaCaWa was a single-arm, mixed-methods interventional study. Fifteen participants aged 4–23 completed the study. Diagnoses included cerebral palsy (10/15) and rare genetic conditions (5/15). Most participants used a wheelchair in community settings. The study included both quantitative measures collected repeatedly and qualitative interviews conducted before and after training.
Participants received 12 weeks of robotic walking delivered in home and community environments. A 12-week follow-up assessment occurred after the end of training. Quantitative outcomes other than family goals were collected every 4 weeks. Family goals using the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) were collected pre-training, immediately post-training, and at 12-week follow-up. Interviews with families were conducted before and after training and analyzed thematically to capture perspectives and perceived changes.
Quantitative outcome domains included:
Quantitative data are reported as medians with 25th–75th percentiles and analyzed using the Skillings-Mack test with post-hoc Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests where applicable. Qualitative interviews were analyzed thematically. The trial registration is NCT05473676 and ethics approval was obtained from the University of Calgary Conjoint Health and Research Ethics Board (REB21-1166).
Postural control showed statistically significant improvement across the study period (Skillings-Mack test statistic = 23.0, p < 0.001). Post-hoc analysis identified an improvement after 8 weeks of training with a median change of 5.0 (25th–75th percentile 0.0–21.4; p = 0.016). Improvements in postural control were maintained through the 12-week follow-up with a median change of 13.7 (3.1–23.7; p = 0.008).
Over half of participants achieved family goals, defined as a GAS t-score greater than 50, at the post-training assessment. Exploratory analyses of sequelae of inactivity found reductions in sleep disturbance immediately after training (p = 0.025) and at 4 weeks after training (p = 0.047).
All measures of physical activity collected in this study (actigraphy and the patient-reported activity measures) did not show improvement over the course of the intervention and follow-up.
Parents reported perceived improvements in several areas after the robotic walking program. Reported gains included improved walking, enhanced activities of daily living, and improvements in sequelae of inactivity such as bowel function, appetite, and sleep. These qualitative perspectives complemented the quantitative findings for postural control and sleep, while highlighting perceived functional benefits not captured by the physical activity measures.
The authors declared that Trexo Robotics provided in-kind support including loan of devices, training and support, and access to device usage data. The research team stated that a data-sharing agreement ensures academic independence. The team also disclosed an unrestricted donation from Trexo Robotics ($40,000 in 2023). The authors reported no further conflicts of interest. Ethical approvals and participant consent were obtained as reported.
This report describes a single-arm study with a small sample (n=15) and diverse diagnoses, which limits generalizability and precludes causal inference versus controlled designs. The authors note that physical activity measures did not improve despite improvements in postural control and parent-reported function, indicating a complex relationship between capacity gains and habitual activity. The source states that future research is warranted to further understand impacts of robotic walking for children and small adults with mobility impairments. Specific recommendations for study design, sample size, or outcome prioritization were not detailed in the source.
In this cohort, a 12-week robotic walking intervention delivered in home and community settings was associated with meaningful improvements in postural control that were maintained at 12-week follow-up. Over half of participants met family-centered goals after training. Exploratory findings suggested improvements in sleep disturbance, while objective and patient-reported measures of physical activity did not improve. Parents reported perceived benefits in walking, daily activities, and sequelae of inactivity such as bowel function and appetite.
Most study data are available openly, with some restricted to protect participant privacy. The authors provided an open-data link and indicated restricted access for certain data; details and instructions for accessing the dataset are available at the cited Borealis repository DOI provided in the source.