Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare, genetic, multiorgan condition that requires lifelong management. While clinical features and medical burden of PCD are increasingly described, less is known about how people with PCD experience social functioning in everyday life. The authors aimed to comprehensively explore social functioning, relationships and support needs among people living with PCD and caregivers, using participatory methods within the international Living with PCD study.
The investigation combined qualitative and quantitative approaches. The team conducted one focus group and two semi-structured interviews with adults and parents of people with PCD. Thematic analysis of these qualitative data informed the creation of a multilingual online questionnaire addressing domains of social functioning. The questionnaire was then deployed as part of the Living with PCD study.
A total of 277 participants completed the questionnaire. Of these, 225 (81%) were adults and adolescents with PCD and 52 (19%) were parents reporting on behalf of a child with PCD. The source reports these numbers but does not provide additional demographic breakdowns, clinical severity, geographical distribution, or age stratification in the summary.
Respondents commonly described strong close relationships and active social lives. The questionnaire responses indicated that PCD had a positive impact on family relationships for a notable proportion: 39% among adult and adolescent participants and 41% among parents reporting for children. These findings suggest that, for many, family bonds can be strengthened in the context of chronic illness management.
Among adult and adolescent respondents, 49% indicated either a positive impact or no impact of PCD on romantic or intimate relationships. However, the study also reports that 17% of adult/adolescent participants had avoided or ended a relationship because of PCD. The source does not provide further qualitative detail here about reasons for avoidance or termination beyond this reported percentage.
PCD affected several practical aspects of daily living. More than half of participants reported impacts in core daily domains: 54% said PCD affected their ability to meet responsibilities, 58% reported reduced free time, and 53% identified increased effort required for planning. These proportions underscore the time and logistical burden that PCD places on patients and caregivers.
Participants felt more at ease discussing PCD with family members, friends, and partners than in professional or educational contexts. In work or educational settings, only 29% of respondents reported receiving support. The questionnaire findings therefore highlight a relative lack of support and comfort in institutional settings compared with personal networks.
When asked about unmet needs, respondents most frequently identified three priorities: financial support, more flexible work or educational policies, and better-trained healthcare professionals. These priorities point to gaps beyond direct clinical care, emphasizing social policy and workforce education as areas for intervention.
The authors interpret the results to indicate that maintaining social functioning while living with PCD demands substantial individual and relational work. To improve social functioning for people with PCD, the study suggests that systemic responses are required across healthcare, education and employment sectors in addition to support from close personal networks. Specific programmatic or policy solutions are not detailed in the source summary.
The research received ethics approval from the Cantonal Research Ethics Committee (initial approval in 2020; scope updated in 2025 under KEK Bern, reference noted in the source). Participants provided consent and governance procedures were followed per the authors’ declarations. The study received financial support from the Swiss National Science Foundation. Several authors reported relationships with patient organizations, professional societies or foundations; the source lists these competing interest disclosures. Data supporting the manuscript are available upon reasonable request by contacting the corresponding author, as stated in the source.