Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs) remain highly prevalent among sonographers. The authors note that nearly 90% of practitioners report WRMSDs despite more than two decades of ergonomic education efforts. The persistence of these injuries motivates a systematic bibliometric mapping of how ergonomic interventions and technological solutions have evolved between 2000 and 2025. The objective is to document trends, identify leading contributors and themes, and clarify the role of technology and environmental change in prevention strategies for the imaging workforce.
The study adhered to reporting practices aligned with PRISMA principles and used the Scopus database to assemble a curated corpus. The final dataset comprised 93 peer-reviewed publications relevant to sonographer ergonomics and preventive interventions published within the 2000–2025 timeframe.
Bibliometric and network analyses were conducted using VOSviewer and the Bibliometrix R-package. Two independent reviewers verified inclusion decisions to reduce selection bias. Quantitative metrics examined publication growth and leading contributors; network mapping identified thematic clusters and conceptual shifts across the literature.
The curated set of 93 Scopus-indexed papers formed the basis for quantitative and relational analyses. VOSviewer was applied to construct visual network maps of co-authorship, co-citation, and keyword co-occurrence. Bibliometrix provided descriptive analytics of publication trends, leading institutions and authors, and thematic cluster detection. The authors report that the combined approach enabled an integrated evaluation of the field’s transition from awareness-raising to technology-focused prevention.
Analysis of the mapped literature revealed a conceptual progression over the 25-year period. Early work prioritized hazard identification, ergonomics education, and individual-level posture correction. In more recent years, the literature shifted toward higher-order technological interventions and environmental redesign as primary prevention strategies.
Examples of more advanced solutions identified in the analysis include workstation automation and the development of specialised transducer handles, representing a move away from sole reliance on behavioural interventions. The authors conclude that education-only models have reached a maximum threshold in practical effectiveness because environmental constraints and high patient volumes frequently prevent sustained individual change.
This thematic transition underscores the framing of technology as a structural prevention support tool rather than as an adjunct to education alone.
The review positions its findings as a roadmap for stakeholders responsible for sonography service delivery and device design. Hospital administrators are encouraged to prioritise proactive environmental transformation — for example, investing in ergonomic workstations and automated aids — over exclusive reliance on training or posture modification programs.
Manufacturers are likewise urged to consider the structural role of device design, such as specialised transducer handles and other operator-focused tools, to reduce physical strain. The study highlights how technological solutions can address constraints imposed by high patient throughput and limited workspace modifications that blunt the effectiveness of education-only strategies.
The study used only secondary bibliometric data from publicly accessible sources; therefore no ethical approval was required according to the authors. All inclusion and extraction steps were documented and independently verified by two reviewers to support reproducibility.
The authors declared no competing interests. The data supporting the findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The report does not provide primary clinical trial data or outcome measures beyond the bibliometric and conceptual mappings described.
This systematic mapping review of 93 Scopus-indexed publications (2000–2025) identifies a clear evolution in sonographer ergonomics literature from awareness and education toward technology-driven and environmental interventions. Given the sustained high prevalence of WRMSDs, the authors recommend prioritising structural, workplace-level solutions — including workstation automation and ergonomically designed devices — alongside ongoing training initiatives.
By documenting the field’s trajectory, the review aims to inform hospital managers and device manufacturers on where to allocate resources to enhance workforce sustainability and reduce occupational injury among sonographers.