The authors present the Physics‑Informed Latent‑Regularized U‑Net (PILR‑U‑Net), a deep learning framework designed for three‑dimensional segmentation of pathological musculoskeletal anatomy on MRI when only limited manual annotations are available. The architecture couples a U‑Net backbone with two regularization strategies: a latent‑space anatomical regularizer learned via transfer from healthy MRI and an elasticity‑based, physics‑informed loss that constrains predicted deformation fields to be mechanically plausible.
The physics‑informed component enforces three biomechanical properties on deformation fields: mechanical equilibrium, near‑incompressibility, and spatial smoothness. These constraints are applied as loss terms during training to bias the network toward anatomically consistent segmentations and deformation maps.
Model development and evaluation used de‑identified MRI data from 50 participants with cerebral palsy. The imaging were previously collected and provided with permission from the original investigators (Bolsterlee et al.). The study applied sparse manual annotations across 15 lower‑limb musculoskeletal structures to simulate limited supervision in pathological data.
The authors note that access to the underlying imaging data remains governed by the policies and permissions of the original data custodians. The present analysis used previously collected, de‑identified data and was determined not to constitute new human subjects research by the authors' institution.
PILR‑U‑Net integrates three main elements:
Transfer learning from healthy MRI to initialize the segmentation network and leverage prior anatomical knowledge.
Latent‑space anatomical regularization that constrains predicted segmentations to reside in a learned manifold of anatomically plausible shapes derived from the transfer‑learned latent representation.
An elasticity‑based physics‑informed loss that imposes mechanical equilibrium, near‑incompressibility, and spatial smoothness on predicted deformation fields. This loss encourages deformation maps with positive Jacobian determinants near unity and smooth strain‑energy distributions, promoting physically realistic transformations between atlas or template anatomy and target images.
These components are trained jointly so the network learns to segment pathological muscles while respecting anatomical priors and biomechanical constraints.
Segmentation performance was quantified using standard measures: volumetric overlap (three‑dimensional Dice coefficient), boundary accuracy (surface distance errors), volume error, sensitivity, and precision. The framework was evaluated across the 15 annotated lower‑limb structures in the cerebral palsy cohort to determine accuracy under sparse supervision.
Ablation experiments were conducted to isolate the contributions of latent‑space anatomical regularization and the physics‑informed loss. The authors compared full PILR‑U‑Net performance to variants with one or both regularization components removed to assess their individual and combined effects on segmentation accuracy and boundary quality.
PILR‑U‑Net produced accurate segmentations across the evaluated structures with three‑dimensional Dice coefficients ranging from 0.750 to 0.943. Most structures showed low surface‑distance errors and acceptable volume error, sensitivity, and precision metrics as reported.
Analysis of predicted deformation fields indicated positive Jacobian determinants close to unity and smooth strain‑energy distributions, consistent with the intended elasticity‑based constraints. These properties suggest the physics‑informed loss successfully biased deformation fields toward near‑incompressible, mechanically reasonable solutions.
Ablation experiments demonstrated that both the latent‑space anatomical regularizer and the physics‑informed loss contributed to improved segmentation. Removing physics‑informed regularization led to the largest reductions in Dice accuracy and increased boundary errors, indicating a substantial role for biomechanical constraints in producing anatomically plausible and accurate segmentations under sparse labeling conditions.
The latent‑space regularization also improved results, supporting the value of transfer learning from healthy MRI and explicit anatomical priors when adapting to pathological anatomy with limited annotations.
The authors conclude that combining anatomical priors and biomechanical constraints in a deep segmentation network can reduce reliance on extensive pathological annotations and enable anatomically plausible, patient‑specific musculoskeletal segmentations from MRI. This capability may support downstream tasks such as patient‑specific musculoskeletal modeling and clinical analysis in populations where manual labeling is costly or limited.
Limitations and important context provided in the source: this work is presented as a preprint and has not been peer reviewed, and thus the methods and results should not be used to guide clinical practice without further validation. The MRI data used were previously collected and obtained from external investigators; access to the underlying imaging is subject to the original custodians’ policies.
Data and code links and supplementary material are referenced by the authors; details about exact annotation sparsity, training hyperparameters, and per‑structure metric breakdowns are reported in the full preprint and supplementary files linked by the source. The authors declared no competing interests and reported that the secondary analysis did not require additional IRB approval.