This research used a participatory co-design approach to develop a community-based walking program aimed at improving physical activity and social connection for people after stroke. The project objective was to integrate social connection and peer support into an accessible walking program that could be delivered in community settings. The resultant program is titled Supportive Strides.
An Integrated Knowledge Translation (iKT) framework guided the development through four sequential stages.
Stage 1: The research team—comprised of 2 stroke survivors and 8 professionals—defined the research questions, scope, and overall plan for the co-design process.
Stage 2: Workshops were held with stroke survivors, carers, and health and design professionals to identify important principles and features for the program. Workshop findings were analysed iteratively and summarised during sessions.
Stage 3: The research team applied a Nominal Group Technique to prioritise elements and make key decisions that shaped the program’s structure and content.
Stage 4: The draft program was presented back to participants for feedback. Comments and recommendations from participants were captured and used to make practical adaptations.
The method emphasized iterative refinement with stakeholder engagement at multiple points to ensure the program reflected lived experience and professional perspectives.
Across the co-design workshops and the feedback stage, 26 participants contributed: 12 stroke survivors, 2 carers, and 12 professionals from relevant disciplines. The mix of lived-experience contributors and multidisciplinary professionals informed both the conceptual principles and practical design choices.
Workshops in Stage 2 highlighted several core principles that the program should prioritise. These included:
These principles directly informed the program elements selected during Stage 3.
The co-designed Supportive Strides program incorporates multiple elements intended to operationalise the identified principles. Core components include:
Accessible outdoor walking routes chosen to suit diverse mobility and safety needs.
A pre-walk coffee and social time to facilitate informal socialisation and peer connection prior to physical activity.
Peer-support mechanisms so participants can share experience, encouragement, and practical tips.
An online group chat to enable communication between sessions, coordination, and ongoing social contact.
Milestone celebrations to acknowledge progress and maintain motivation.
A safety checklist to address practical safety concerns for participants and facilitators.
These elements were selected through the Nominal Group Technique and refined with stakeholder input to align with user priorities and pragmatic delivery considerations.
During Stage 4 the program was presented to participants and feedback was solicited. Participant suggestions led to concrete adjustments before the program was finalised for testing. Reported adaptations included:
Introducing a simpler screening process to reduce barriers to participation and streamline enrolment.
Providing more detailed information about walking routes so participants could assess accessibility, surface conditions, and distance.
The study notes that workshop findings were iteratively analysed and summarised throughout sessions, supporting ongoing refinement informed by participant input.
The study received ethical approval from the University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee (ID: 2025-32829-68681-3). The work was supported by a 2024 Melbourne Disability Institute Seed Funding Grant and fellowship support acknowledged from the National Health and Medical Research Council and University of Melbourne fellowships as described by the authors.
Competing interests and funding statements are reported in the source. Specific declared supports include NHMRC fellowships and institutional fellowships; one author declared equity in a company and honoraria from named organizations. All other authors declared no competing interests. The authors state that all necessary participant consent and institutional approvals were obtained. The source also indicates that data from the study are available on reasonable request.
Using a four-stage iKT co-design process the team developed the Supportive Strides community-based walking program, embedding socialisation and peer support features prioritised by stroke survivors, carers, and professionals. The program is described by the authors as ready for testing to determine its effectiveness for improving physical activity and social connection after stroke.
Details about planned evaluation methods or timelines for testing were not reported in the source article. The program components, stakeholder engagement process, ethical approvals, funding, and competing interest statements are provided in the source material.