This prospective cohort study assessed whether multidimensional religiosity and spirituality (R/S) predict future behavioural and biological components of the cardiovascular risk profile. The authors note that while R/S is often associated cross-sectionally with a more favourable cardiovascular risk profile, longitudinal evidence is limited; this analysis therefore tested prospective associations between R/S and subsequent health behaviours and biomarkers in an older English cohort.
The analysis used participants from waves 4–7 of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). The analytic sample included 6,844 adults aged 50 years or older. The sample was 56% women, with a reported mean R/S score of 2.1; 20% of participants were weekly religious attenders and 81% identified as Christian.
Religiosity and spirituality were assessed using four items derived from the Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire. The source provides these R/S dimensions but does not list the exact item wording in this summary beyond indicating components such as frequency of attendance, daily prayer/meditation, participation in organized religion, and the importance or purpose of faith.
Behavioural outcomes prospectively examined included:
Biological outcomes included measured cardiovascular or metabolic markers:
The authors used hierarchical linear and logistic regression models to examine longitudinal associations between R/S indicators and outcomes. Models were adjusted for key sociodemographic confounders: age, sex, wealth, education and ethnicity. For biomarker outcomes, models additionally adjusted for health behaviours and body mass index (BMI). The paper reports regression coefficients (B) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals for the observed associations.
Daily prayer/meditation independently predicted a small increase in fruit and vegetable intake (B = 0.004; 95% CI [0.000, 0.008]).
Several R/S indicators were associated with lower odds of meeting recommended levels of physical activity: frequent attendance (OR = 0.846; 95% CI [0.730, 0.982]), the significance or importance of faith (OR = 0.935; 95% CI [0.879, 0.994]) and religious purpose (OR = 0.939; 95% CI [0.884, 0.997]).
No independent prospective associations were reported in the summary between R/S and smoking or alcohol intake.
These results indicate a mixed behavioural pattern: some R/S dimensions related to healthier dietary intake, whereas others were associated with reduced likelihood of achieving recommended physical activity.
Multiple R/S measures were independently associated with lower fibrinogen: greater spirituality (B = −0.019; 95% CI [−0.036, −0.003]), daily prayer/meditation (B = −0.017; 95% CI [−0.032, −0.002]), participation in organized religion (B = −0.017; 95% CI [−0.032, −0.002]) and importance of religious faith (B = −0.017; 95% CI [−0.033, −0.002]).
Frequent attendance was associated with a small prospective increase in HbA1c (B = 0.002; 95% CI [0.000, 0.005]).
There were no independent associations reported between R/S indicators and CRP or blood pressure in the adjusted longitudinal models.
The biomarker pattern mirrors the behavioural findings: some R/S dimensions correlate with lower fibrinogen (an inflammatory/fibrinolytic marker), while other dimensions showed an association with modestly higher glycaemia (HbA1c).
This ELSA-based prospective analysis demonstrates heterogeneous effects of different R/S dimensions on components of cardiovascular risk among older adults. On one hand, several measures of spirituality and religious engagement predicted lower fibrinogen and daily prayer/meditation predicted slightly better fruit and vegetable intake—both changes that would be considered favourable for cardiovascular risk.
On the other hand, frequent religious attendance and higher reported religious significance or purpose were associated with lower odds of meeting exercise recommendations and a small increase in HbA1c, outcomes that would be unfavourable for cardiometabolic risk. No longitudinal associations were observed with CRP or blood pressure in adjusted models.
Clinicians and researchers should note that R/S is multidimensional: different aspects (private practices, organizational participation, perceived importance) may have divergent behavioural and biological associations. The findings highlight the importance of assessing specific R/S dimensions rather than treating religiosity or spirituality as a single construct when considering potential links to cardiovascular risk.
The report states that ethical approvals covering ELSA waves analysed were obtained from the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery and Institute of Neurology Joint Research Ethics Committee, the Berkshire Research Ethics Committee, and the National Research Ethics Service Committee South Central – Berkshire with specific wave references provided. All participants provided written informed consent. The authors declared no competing interests.
Funding sources listed included the National Institute on Aging (R01AG017644) and the National Institute for Health and Care Research (98_1074_03). The data used are third-party ELSA data; access requires application to and approval from the ELSA study team and datasets are available through the UK Data Service (Study Number 5050).
In this longitudinal cohort of older adults, different R/S dimensions showed mixed prospective associations with the cardiovascular risk profile: favourable associations for fibrinogen and fruit and vegetable intake, and unfavourable associations for physical activity and HbA1c. There were no independent prospective links with CRP or blood pressure. These results underscore the complexity of R/S effects on health and the need to examine specific dimensions when evaluating potential cardiovascular impacts. The source does not provide additional mechanistic analyses or detailed item wording for the R/S measure in this summary.