Tensor-valued diffusion encoding (TDE) expands on conventional pulsed-gradient approaches by using advanced diffusion-encoding waveforms and modeling to increase specificity to tissue microstructure. A known limitation of TDE is the substantially longer diffusion-encoding duration required to reach a given b-value, which reduces signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and commonly forces coarser spatial resolution (>2 mm isotropic). This study developed and evaluated an SNR-efficient tensor-valued diffusion encoding protocol aiming for high spatial resolution and clinically feasible scan time to support studies of brain microstructural changes relevant to neurodegeneration.
The authors implemented an in-house TDE sequence on a 3T scanner incorporating an SNR-efficient multi-band, multi-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) readout and a dedicated reconstruction pipeline. The protocol targeted 1.8-mm isotropic resolution with roughly 70-mm brain coverage and a total acquisition time of approximately 12 minutes. The sequence design focused on reducing SNR loss associated with prolonged diffusion-encoding durations intrinsic to TDE while preserving clinically acceptable scan duration.
Two cohorts were scanned at 3T: eleven cognitively normal older adults (5 female, 6 male; ages 62–71) and seven younger adults (3 female, 4 male; ages 22–31). Older participants underwent two separate scans to permit reproducibility assessment. The manuscript reports that institutional review and participant consent procedures were followed under Stanford University Institutional Review Board #76617.
Quantitative diffusion-derived metrics were computed from the TDE acquisitions and included:
Analyses focused on the bilateral temporal parts of the cingulum bundles (CBT), the bilateral fornix (FX), and global white matter (WM).
Reproducibility was assessed in the older cohort using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland–Altman analysis; older participants had repeat scans to enable these measures. Group comparisons between younger and older subjects used Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple comparisons. The source reports ICC values as a reproducibility metric and notes Bland–Altman analysis was performed, but detailed Bland–Altman results are not reported in the article body.
Exploratory comparisons were conducted between the younger and older groups for each diffusion metric within the predefined regions of interest. Initial tests identified age-related differences in FA, μFA, and MKA with p < 0.05 prior to FDR correction, particularly pronounced in the fornix. After applying FDR correction for multiple comparisons, none of these differences remained statistically significant.
The reported results indicate that an SNR-efficient TDE protocol can deliver sub-2-mm isotropic resolution diffusion imaging within a clinically reasonable scan time. Demonstrated reproducibility for most diffusion-derived microstructural metrics supports the method's potential utility for high-resolution studies of white matter microstructure, including applications in aging and neurodegeneration research where small tracts such as the fornix are of interest. The absence of robust age-related effects after multiple comparison correction highlights the exploratory nature of the group comparisons and suggests larger samples will be needed to confirm subtle microstructural differences.
Limitations explicitly reported or implied by the source include the small sample sizes (eleven older and seven younger adults) and the exploratory status of age-related comparisons, which did not remain significant after FDR correction. The article notes that Bland–Altman results were performed but detailed statistics beyond ICC thresholds were not reported in the source text. Data produced in the study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. The authors declared no competing interests. Funding sources reported include NIH grants K99AG080076, R01NS095985, and R01NS125781. Institutional review board approval was obtained from Stanford University (IRB #76617) and all required participant consents and reporting guidelines were followed.