There remains substantial uncertainty about the safety of attempting a trial of labour after more than one prior caesarean delivery. This protocol describes a large retrospective, population-based cohort study that aims to quantify the risk of uterine rupture during a trial of labour in women with two or more previous caesarean deliveries. The primary objective is to develop a multivariable predictive model estimating the probability of uterine rupture among eligible women and thereby inform clinician counselling for those requesting a vaginal birth after caesarean when they have had multiple prior caesareans.
The study will use publicly available United States birth registration data maintained by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The cohort will include all registered births recorded from 2011 through the most recent year with available data at the time of analysis. The authors state that the dataset is accessible via the CDC vital statistics data access webpages and that records are deidentified for research use.
The protocol restricts the analytic cohort to women with at least two previous caesarean deliveries who meet a minimum interpregnancy interval of 21 months. Further cohort selection criteria, such as gestational age limits, singleton versus multiple pregnancy status, or other clinical exclusions, are not detailed in the abstract and will be applied as specified in the full protocol and dataset variable availability.
The study’s primary outcome is occurrence of uterine rupture during a trial of labour in the target population. The abstract specifies use of registry-recorded outcomes from the CDC data; however, the precise case definition, coding approach, and adjudication procedures for uterine rupture as captured in the vital records are not reported in the abstract and will depend on the variables and coding practices in the source dataset.
A multivariable fitted model will be used to estimate the probability of uterine rupture in women with two or more prior caesarean deliveries. The abstract indicates development of a predictive model but does not report the specific modelling technique (for example logistic regression, machine learning methods), candidate predictor variables, handling of missing data, model validation approach, or planned performance metrics. These analytic details are part of the full protocol and will be implemented using available registry variables.
The stated intent is that the multivariable model will provide individualized or population-level risk estimates to support clinician–patient counselling about attempt of vaginal birth after multiple caesareans.
Authors report that the project uses publicly available, deidentified CDC vital statistics data and that necessary ethical guidelines and oversight requirements have been followed. The protocol indicates that appropriate IRB/ethics committee approvals or exemptions and data-use considerations have been addressed given the nature of the dataset. The authors also affirm adherence to relevant research reporting guidelines and note that any prospective interventional studies would be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry when applicable.
The authors declared no competing interests. The manuscript is posted as a preprint and has not undergone peer review; users are reminded that findings from preprints should not be used to guide clinical practice without formal peer review and confirmation.
This abstract outlines the study design and intended analysis but does not provide results. Key analytic details were not reported in the abstract, including the specific predictor variables to be included in the model, modelling methodology, planned internal or external validation, sample size or event count estimates, and the exact final year of data to be included. The preprint was posted July 21, 2026. Readers should consult the full protocol or subsequent peer-reviewed report for complete methodological detail and for model performance and validation results.
If implemented and validated, the proposed multivariable model could supply clinicians with quantitative estimates of uterine rupture risk for women considering a trial of labour after two or more previous caesarean deliveries, potentially improving shared decision-making and counselling. The abstract emphasizes the need for robust, population-level evidence in this area but does not present outcome data or recommendations; these will depend on the model’s development and validation as reported in the full study.