Nurses and midwives experience disproportionate levels of occupational violence, yet conventional incident reporting systems and retrospective surveys frequently underestimate both frequency and contextual details of these events. Traditional methods may miss transient or witnessed incidents and offer limited insight into reporting behaviour. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) — repeated brief surveys delivered near the time of exposure — can capture incidents in near-real time and provide richer contextual information. This study evaluated whether a commercially available smartphone EMA application could feasibly collect data on the incidence, characteristics, and reporting of occupational violence among hospital nurses and midwives.
The primary aim was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a smartphone-based EMA application (MetricWire) for capturing occupational violence exposure in nurses and midwives. Specific objectives included measuring the incidence of reported events across momentary assessments, describing incident characteristics (type and perpetrator), documenting reporting behaviour, and assessing user acceptability and usability of the application.
This was a prospective, single-site feasibility study conducted at a large public hospital. A total of 108 nurses and midwives were enrolled. Participants used a commercially available EMA platform (MetricWire) to submit brief, two-hourly momentary assessments across their clinical shifts over a three-week period.
Participants were prompted to report whether an incident of occupational violence had occurred during each two-hour block, and, if so, to provide details on incident characteristics and reporting. Usability and acceptability were later assessed among respondents who provided feedback.
Of the 108 enrolled participants, 69 contributed usable momentary assessment data. These 69 participants submitted 607 momentary assessments in total and recorded 111 incidents of occupational violence. Analyses were descriptive: incidence rates across momentary assessments, frequencies and proportions for incident types and perpetrators, proportions for reporting behaviour, and summary descriptions of usability responses.
Violence was reported in 18.6% of momentary assessments. Overall, 62% of participants who contributed data reported at least one incident during the study period.
Among recorded incidents, the majority were verbal in nature (69%). Most incidents were patient-perpetrated (86%). A notable proportion of incidents (59%) involved witnessing violence against a colleague rather than being the direct target, indicating that EMA captured exposure beyond direct personal victimisation.
These findings highlight both the frequency of near-real-time reported events and the predominance of verbal confrontations and patient-originated aggression in the sampled hospital setting.
Reporting patterns showed a discrepancy between informal and formal channels. While 57% of incidents were reported to someone (informal reporting), only 6% of incidents reached the formal incident management system. This gap demonstrates substantial under-reporting to institutional reporting systems and suggests conventional incident records likely underrepresent real-world exposure.
EMA captured both the act of reporting and the absence of formal escalation in many cases, providing insight into the pathways and barriers to formal incident logging.
Usability feedback was collected from a subset of participants (n = 16). Respondents reported that the MetricWire application was easy to use and acceptable for capturing occupational violence data. The source reports these acceptability findings descriptively; detailed usability metrics and qualitative themes beyond the acceptability statement were not reported in the source.
The Human Research Ethics Committee of Queensland Health Metro North provided ethical approval for the study. The authors declared no competing interests. The paper is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed; the source emphasizes that findings should not be used to guide clinical practice until formal review.
All data produced in the study are available upon reasonable request to the authors, according to the source article.
This feasibility study indicates that a smartphone-based EMA approach is practicable and acceptable for collecting near-real-time, context-rich data on occupational violence among nurses and midwives. The method captured a substantial number of incidents, including witnessed events and many episodes that did not reach formal reporting systems, underscoring the potential of EMA to reveal under-reported exposures and contextual detail missing from conventional incident records and retrospective surveys.
The strong predominance of verbal and patient-perpetrated incidents and the low proportion reaching formal incident management suggest opportunities for targeted interventions, improved reporting pathways, and enhanced staff support. The source did not provide detailed generalizability assessments, sample representativeness analyses, or in-depth exploration of potential biases inherent to EMA administration (for example, selection bias among participants who opted into the study or variation in response completeness), so those considerations were not reported here.
In summary, the study supports the feasibility and acceptability of using a commercially available smartphone EMA platform (MetricWire) to capture occupational violence exposure among hospital nurses and midwives, and it highlights substantial under-reporting to formal systems that warrants further investigation and potential system-level responses.