Head nurses reported several immediate, context-specific conditions that affected both client access to services and the facility's capacity to monitor immunisation. Population mobility—movement of families within and between health areas—reduced predictability of attendance and complicated tracking of children due for vaccines. Seasonality and related livelihood demands constrained caregiver availability at particular times of year and increased time pressures for both staff and clients. Time constraints emerged as a barrier to thorough monitoring and follow-up, limiting opportunities for outreach and active defaulter tracing.
These situational elements influenced day-to-day operations and were described as intermittent but recurrent challenges that directly shape uptake and the completeness of routine immunisation sessions.
Participants identified multiple structural determinants within the health system and facility environment. Peripheral governance arrangements and the quality of microplanning at facility level affected how services were organised and resourced. Information flow between facilities and the health zone, and within facility teams, influenced timely decision-making and the ability to anticipate needs.
Functional staff availability was highlighted as a structural constraint: staffing levels and the functional distribution of responsibilities limited service continuity. Operational and logistical resources—supplies, cold chain capacity, transport and routine operational funding—were variable and in some instances inadequate. Community organisation, including the presence and coordination of community health workers and local leaders, also shaped the reach and acceptability of services.
Combined, these structural factors determined the baseline capacity of facilities to deliver routine EPI activities and to respond to situational pressures.
Cultural and professional norms influenced both provider behaviour and caregiver responses. Head nurses described norms within the health workforce that shaped expectations about responsibilities and acceptable workarounds. Caregiver perceptions of vaccination—beliefs about benefits and risks, and variable adherence to official EPI requirements—affected uptake.
Language-related influences were noted as affecting trust: communication barriers could reduce understanding and community confidence in services. These cultural elements intersected with structural and situational factors to influence both the demand for immunisation and the quality of provider–client interactions.
Exogenous factors centred on dependence on decisions made at the health-zone level and on external funding or programme support. Participants described shifts in how routine costs were managed, with some costs effectively transferred to facilities and to individual health workers. External resources and directives shaped priority setting and could limit local autonomy. These dependencies affected the predictability of routine operations and the capacity to maintain consistent service delivery.
Across all four contextual dimensions, respondents reported compensatory local adaptations that sustained services despite constraints. These included pragmatic microplanning adjustments, informal coordination mechanisms with community actors, reallocations of staff time, and use of personal or facility-limited funds to cover routine costs when formal resources were lacking.
These adaptations preserved continuity of routine immunisation but often relied on personal resources or informal practices that may not be sustainable or equitable.
Participants and the authors draw practical implications from the findings. Strengthening routine immunisation requires:
These measures aim to enhance the resilience and sustainability of routine immunisation delivery within the constraints described by head nurses.
This research used a multiple case study design carried out from May to June 2026 in seven health areas of the urban Mumbunda Health Zone. Seven head nurses were purposively selected for semi-structured individual interviews; four participants completed follow-up interviews for clarification and elaboration. Interviews were analysed through reflexive thematic analysis with systematic within-case and cross-case comparisons.
Findings were organised using the four contextual dimensions of Leichter's framework (situational, structural, cultural, exogenous), which provided a structured lens while allowing an inductive cross-cutting theme of local adaptation to emerge.
Strengths of the study include the multiple-case design enabling systematic comparison across seven health areas, the use of follow-up interviews to refine accounts, and a clear analytical structure via Leichter's framework. Limitations are that the findings reflect the perspectives of seven head nurses only and do not directly represent other EPI stakeholders; data were collected in a single urban health zone during a limited period, constraining assessment of variation across settings and over time. Full qualitative transcripts are not publicly available because of re-identification risk; de-identified data supporting the findings are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and subject to institutional conditions.
Ethical oversight: the study was authorised through institutional procedures at the School of Public Health, University of Lubumbashi, and was deemed exempt from formal research ethics committee review. The Mumbunda Health Zone Central Office and participating facilities were informed about objectives and procedures.
The study's conclusions emphasise enabling predictable operational financing, participatory microplanning and contextually tailored support to sustain and strengthen routine EPI services while reducing reliance on informal adaptations.