Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer globally and a leading cause of cancer mortality. In Cameroon it is the leading cancer among women, representing 34.1% of new female cancer cases in available national data. Where mammography is poorly accessible or unaffordable, promotion of breast self-examination (BSE) and clinical breast examination (CBE) can support early detection through improved breast awareness. The authors report a community-based cross-sectional assessment conducted to characterize knowledge and practice of BSE and CBE in the Buea Health District, Cameroon, because uptake in this setting was not well described.
The study used a community-based cross-sectional design conducted between June and December 2020. The sample comprised 346 women aged 21–60 years across five health areas of the Buea Health District. Probability-proportionate-to-size sampling was applied to select participants. Data analysis used IBM SPSS Statistics version 21.0 with significance set at p < 0.05.
Investigators collected data using a structured questionnaire that covered general breast cancer knowledge, specific knowledge about BSE and CBE, and self-reported practice of these screening approaches. Knowledge and practice scores were categorized as good when ≥70% and poor when <70% of items were correctly answered or reported. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, and multivariate binary logistic regression were performed to evaluate associations and predictors.
The mean age of participants was 28.3 years (SD = 7.0). Most participants were single (67.0%) and had attained university education (62.1%). The report provides these sociodemographic descriptors as the context for interpreting knowledge and practice levels.
Overall, good breast cancer knowledge was demonstrated by 24.0% of participants (95% CI: 19.6%–28.4%). Good knowledge specific to BSE and CBE was found in 26.9% of women (95% CI: 22.3%–31.6%). These proportions indicate that the majority of women in the surveyed community had subthreshold knowledge by the study’s predefined cutoffs.
Satisfactory BSE/CBE practice—defined by the study as scoring ≥70% on practice-related items—was observed in 22.3% of participants (95% CI: 17.9%–26.7%). Thus, fewer than one in four women reported practice levels that met the investigators’ criteria for satisfactory BSE/CBE practice.
The authors report a significant positive association between knowledge and practice (χ² = 73.324, p < 0.001, φ = 0.460), indicating that higher knowledge scores correlated with better practice. In multivariate analysis, having a university education was independently associated with satisfactory BSE/CBE practice (adjusted odds ratio 2.148; 95% CI: 1.544–2.649; p < 0.001). The report does not provide other model covariates or full regression tables within the abstract; details beyond the presented odds ratio were not reported in the source abstract.
Ethical approval for the study was granted by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea (reference number: 1199-04). The authors confirm participant consent and adherence to ethical guidelines. The source states that the data supporting the findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
The investigators conclude that both knowledge and practice of BSE and CBE are critically low among women in the Buea Health District. Given the observed association between education and practice, they recommend urgent, multilevel community-based breast cancer education interventions that particularly target women with limited formal education to improve early detection and reduce breast cancer mortality in Cameroon.
Note on reporting completeness
The abstract provides key prevalence estimates, the primary independent predictor identified, and ethical approval details. The source is a preprint and notes it has not undergone peer review. Additional methodological details (for example, full regression covariates, questionnaire items, response rates, and limitations) and complete results tables were not reported in the abstract; interested readers are referred to the full preprint for those elements or to contact the corresponding author for data access as indicated.