The PubMed record describes a clinical audit titled Concordance of surveillance colonoscopy recommended intervals with Australian guidelines: a clinical audit in six Victorian public hospitals, published in Australian Health Review. The citation shown is 2026 Sep 3;50(3):AH26018 with DOI 10.1071/AH26018 and PubMed PMID 42656090. The listing identifies the work as an audit focused on the concordance between recommended surveillance colonoscopy intervals and Australian guidelines, conducted across six public hospitals in Victoria.
The PubMed entry supplies bibliographic and access information, including a link to full-text options. However, the abstract text, study methods, results and conclusions are not included in the portion of the record provided here.
The article lists multiple authors and their institutional affiliations. Lead and coauthors include Jonathan Foo, Corey Joseph and Alexandra Gorelik, affiliated with the School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine at Monash University. Additional authors represent institutions and disciplines including health services research, paediatrics, nursing and midwifery, general practice, gastroenterology and regional health services.
Affiliations enumerated in the PubMed record include:
These listings indicate a multidisciplinary team and cross-institutional collaboration for the reported audit.
The title and PubMed summary indicate the audit was performed in six Victorian public hospitals. The entry does not enumerate the specific hospitals by name beyond the institutional affiliations listed for authors and regional health services. The primary clinical focus, as described, is surveillance colonoscopy interval recommendations and their concordance with Australian guidelines.
The PubMed record provides key identifiers for locating the full article: PubMed PMID 42656090 and DOI 10.1071/AH26018. The record includes a link to full-text options via Silverchair Information Systems and other LinkOut resources. Readers requiring the complete audit report, including methods, data and authors’ conclusions, should follow those links or access the journal’s full text through their institution or library.
The excerpted PubMed entry does not include the article abstract or any of the audit’s internal details. Specifically, the following items are not reported in the provided source text:
Because these critical elements are absent from the PubMed snippet, no study-specific findings or recommendations can be restated without consulting the full text.
The PubMed entry documents the existence of a multidisciplinary clinical audit on the concordance of surveillance colonoscopy recommended intervals with Australian guidelines in six Victorian public hospitals and provides the bibliographic means (PMID and DOI) to retrieve the full report. For clinicians, health services researchers and policy makers wishing to examine methods, measured concordance and the authors’ conclusions, accessing the full text via the DOI link, the journal (Aust Health Rev) or institutional subscriptions is necessary because the PubMed record shown does not contain the abstract or outcome data.
In summary, the PubMed record reliably identifies the article, authorship and institutional collaboration, but does not present the audit methodology, results or conclusions in the provided text. Those wanting to evaluate the audit’s implications for practice or guideline adherence should consult the complete article using the provided DOI or full-text links.