This study aimed to develop and evaluate machine learning methods for automated identification of family relationships from routinely collected demographic fields in electronic health records (EHRs). The goal was to support patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) and health-care applications by detecting five relationship types: Mother-Child, Father-Child, Sibling-Sibling, Twin-Twin, and Partner-Partner. The authors emphasize the need for probabilistic outputs (rather than only rule-based matches) to permit configurable deployment thresholds in research and clinical contexts.
The work used two large-scale Indiana datasets. The primary EHR repository was the Indiana Network for Patient Care (INPC), containing approximately 15 million unique individuals across roughly 45 million medical records. The gold standard for verified family relationships was the Indiana Natality dataset (birth certificates spanning 1970–2024). Positive (true) relationship cases were created by linking Natality-verified relationships to INPC via a shared Global Identifier.
To identify candidate negative examples and reduce computational burden, the study deployed a three-tier blocking strategy combined with a sliding-window restriction and similarity scoring. This approach reduced an initial comparison space of greater than 10^14 potential pairs to about 121 million candidate pairs for consideration. The reduction strategy aimed to balance sensitivity for true matches with practical feasibility for large-scale linkage and classifier training.
Five Random Forest classifiers were trained, one per relationship type. The authors describe a four-stage iterative refinement workflow:
This iterative process was used to improve precision and overall model discrimination in preparation for PCOR and healthcare deployment scenarios.
Across the five relationship classifiers, reported performance was high. Precision ranged from 0.92 to 1.00, recall from 0.97 to 1.00, and F1 scores from 0.94 to 1.00. Specific F1 values reported were: Mother-Child 0.97, Father-Child 0.98, Sibling-Sibling 0.98, Twin-Twin 1.00, and Partner-Partner 0.94. The authors also report that high-confidence predictions (probability ≥ 0.9) captured between 77% and 99% of true positives, indicating that probability thresholds can be tuned to balance coverage and precision.
A central limitation encountered was that a substantial fraction of Natality-verified relationships had no overlapping contact information in INPC and therefore were structurally undetectable by record linkage. The proportion of such un-linkable verified relationships ranged from 15% to 78% depending on relationship type. To address this, the authors restricted training and evaluation in some iterations to only linkable pairs (those with at least one shared contact feature), which improved precision. Additional training-data refinement produced modest F1 improvements of 0.02–0.04 for the Mother-Child, Father-Child, and Sibling classifiers.
Feature importance analysis identified age difference as the dominant predictor for parent–child and twin relationships. For sibling detection, phone number similarity emerged as the most important feature. The iterative refinement process included systematic error analysis that guided targeted feature engineering and model adjustments.
The proposed framework operates on standard demographic fields commonly available in EHR systems, enabling adaptation to other health-system datasets. Compared with rule-based linkage methods, the Random Forest approach supplies probability scores that allow configurable decision thresholds and probabilistic confidence measures. The authors note practical constraints: many true biological relationships do not leave overlapping demographic footprints in clinical data, limiting detectability with record linkage alone. They also make clear this work is a preprint and not yet peer reviewed, and therefore not ready to guide clinical practice without further validation.
Ethical oversight was reported: the Institutional Review Board of Indiana University approved the work (Protocol #22665, Expedited Category 5). The underlying data contain sensitive personally identifiable information and cannot be shared publicly. The authors conclude the Random Forest models demonstrated high performance suitable for large-scale research deployment and are ready for testing in clinical applications rather than immediate widespread clinical use. The methodology can be adapted to other EHR systems to support family-centered study design in PCOR.